The power of racism is among us: how government perpetuates racism

May 10, 2023

LOS ANGELES CITY GOVERNMENT ACCUSED OF RACIAL AND DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION. ABUSE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.

(Published by LACityClerkConnect Council File Management System)

September 10, 2022

All about racism practiced by Hi Point 1522 LLC

Johnson for Mayor Confronts City Los Angeles

Corruption and Racism

2022

California. Governor Gavin Newsom has been asked to fire another state worker due to racism charges against the employee.

https://www.johnsonformayor-2022.com/

The power of racism is among us:

how government perpetuates racism

The Unruh Act. CIVIL CODE – CIV DIVISION 1. PERSONS [38 – 86]  ( Heading of Division 1 amended by Stats. 1988, Ch. 160, Sec. 12. )PART 2. PERSONAL RIGHTS [43 – 53.7]  ( Part 2 enacted 1872. ) 51.  (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited, as the (California) Unruh Civil Rights Act.

(b) All persons within the jurisdiction of this state are free and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever.

(c) This section shall not be construed to confer any right or privilege on a person that is conditioned or limited by law or that is applicable alike to persons of every sex, color, race, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status, or to persons regardless of their genetic information.

 (6) “Sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status” includes a perception that the person has any particular characteristic or characteristics within the listed categories or that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any particular characteristic or characteristics within the listed categories.

(This section of the United States Code, § 1981, is based on section one of the Civil Rights Act of 1866.[8] “All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.”)

City Los Angeles Bridge Home Staff. Which employee is responsible for denial of full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever ?

September 3, 2020

Governor Newsom: which Blacks do we lynch

and which do we not lynch? Can you answer the question?

Subject: Which persons are entitled to “full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever”.

From: GJohnson (redacted)
To: elizabeth.reyes@dfeh.ca.gov; gilbert.aragon@dfeh.ca.gov; kenady.hunley@dfeh.ca.gov; gavin@gavinnewsom.com; contact.center@dfeh.ca.gov


Date: Thursday, September 3, 2020, 12:09 PM PDT

(As posted to the worldwide web]

The power of racism is among us:

how the government perpetuates

racism

2020

Maria Gonzalez Marshalena Adkins Sandhya Panda Pamela Phimmasenh Nai Saechao Colleen Janetpour James Baca
Elizabeth Reyes. Gilbert Aragon. Kenady Hunley.

2019
Selena Wong Adele Cox

2018
Susia Parra

2017
Camilla.Asuncion
Julia Araneta@dfeh.ca.gov James Cortes

2016
Karina Arabolaza Gloria Morales Mimi Infantino Rangi Ravi

2015
Noah Frigault
Debbie L. Harmon (HUD)

2014
Teri Houston

To whom it may concern:

I continue to incur damages including but not limited to fax service, voicemail service, postage, police alarm permit, rent payments, related to complaints filed with you regarding Unruh election practices and/or denial of housing services.

There once was a little poor white boy from the backwoods of Alabama whose name was Jimmy McGillicuddy Grimaldi, or maybe that was not his name. Nice kid and grew up to have a family and become an electrician. So one day he met a little Black boy who was aged 25. The Black Boy was having trouble with his landlord because even though he paid his rent, the landlord had extra parking stalls, but would not give the Black boy one of the parking stalls. Also, the Black boy’s intercom did not work. Well Black boy complained and complained about that intercom and years passed by and still no repairs to the intercom. So one day he met the white boy named Jimmy McGillicuddy Grimaldi, I think that was his name. The Black Boy told Jimmy about his troubles with the landlord. Jimmy was white about aged 45. These were the days when society conditioned folks to believe that whites were always right and that white people knew everything. Jimmy was angry and he told the Black Boy, “You pay your rent and you are entitled to housing services like maintenance. You should only have to ask for repair or replacement one time, one time! You are entitled to parking and you are entitled to a working intercom.” He was told he could get a rent reduction and claim discrimination. Even though the owner had extra parking stalls, he would give one to a white person in a second but not to the Black Boy. But this story is not about the Black Boy nor is is about Jimmy McGillicuddy Grimaldi. It is about a white plantation owner landlord who is allowed to get away with racism year after year. How does this white man have so much power? How many other people give him that power? Now if you think this story is about an unjust situation, then all power to you. So maybe you will agree that this one white man should not have that much power. But if you think this white property owner is a good person and should be able to do whatever he wants to do, then you can take this story and just shove it you know where. That’s what Jimmy McGillicuddy Grimaldi would say, if that is his name. I will never forget Jimmy.

For those who act in discriminatory, arbitrary, capricious, and unjust manners, I ask these questions in remembrance of all the Black Americans who were lynched, in remembrance of the white government employees who were members of the Ku Klux Klan and participated in the dismemberment and torture of Black Americans, I ask:

You are government employees. Whether your family member, co-worker, or friend, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status, please name which persons you feel are entitled to the “full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever”.

All rights reserved.

Geary Juan Johnson

1522 Hi Point St 9

Los Angeles CA 90035

Phone (redacted)
cc: HUD, US Justice Department

Will the Governor answer which

persons he feels are entitled?

The DFEH Complaint Against Mark Ridley-Thomas

From: GJohnson (email redacted)
To: kenady.hunley@dfeh.ca.gov; gavin@gavinnewsom.com
Cc: elizabeth.reyes@dfeh.ca.gov; gilbert.aragon@dfeh.ca.gov; answers@hud.gov; askdoj@usdoj.gov

Date: Thursday, September 3, 2020, 10:32 AM PDT

DFEH case Johnson/ MARK RIDLEY THOMAS

DFEH case number 202003-09710825

Dear DFEH:

The matter is appealed in accordance with the phone intake today.
As discussed, res judicata prohibits you from dismissing the intake on the grounds that the DFEH already issued two complaints (Holman and LWV) that approved that the prima facie elements had been met and this is the same or substantially similar facts.

Under the Unruh Act, “all persons” are entitled to full and equal privileges, etc. I have been denied full and equal privileges as a 100% (not 2/3 human) Black American male, color medium, over the age of 65; and denied such privileges by the respondent Mark Ridley Thomas who has aided in the deprivation of full and equal rights, as enumerated in the complaint. The respondent participated in government funded candidate forums where all persons were not treated alike.

As I said before, Kenady needs to be terminated from employment for practicing racial discrimination. She admitted that she was not able to read or comprehend Unruh, and she proceeded to make up her own laws, and said that her supervisor would be doing the same. To Kenady, I am only 2/3 of a human.

What progress have you made Governor Newsom on

terminating racist employees from state government?

Claimant is a Black American, male, and was a Los Angeles political candidate at the time of the dates of injury. The Unruh Act provides protection to “all persons”.
On or around Jan. 11, Jan, 12, and Jan. 25 Claimant was refused full and equal privileges at candidate forums held in Los Angeles for the 2020 March election.
The basis and nexus herein is that Respondent Mark Ridley-Thomas (“MRT”) at the time of the events was a Los Angeles County Supervisor of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, an elected body that along with the LA County Registrar, supervised the city and council election process, to assure that the election complied with all civil rights laws.
On Jan. 11, and Jan. 12, claimant asked respondent in person at the candidate forums to allow him full and equal participation at the city sponsored candidate forums. Respondent, a county official, did not respond to Claimant requests. Respondent participated on the podium as a candidate and aided in the presentation of the candidate forums. Without the aid of MRT, the forums would not have happened.


Did respondent MRT deny, aid, incite, discriminate, or make distinction that denied full and equal accommodations, advantages , facilities , privileges, or services to plaintiff?

Yes. Respondent did aid the practice of the candidate forums that excluded Claimant from full and equal advantages and services.

The basis and nexus for this complaint has been established.

I reserve the right to make further comment as to the appeal. All rights reserved.

Geary Juan Johnson

1522 Hi Point St 9

Los Angeles CA 90035

Phone (redacted)

On Thursday, September 3, 2020, 10:07:05 AM PDT, Hunley, Kenady@DFEH <kenady.hunley@dfeh.ca.gov> wrote:

Good morning Geary Juan Johnson,
I talked to my Supervisor regarding your intake interview this morning and she has agreed that unfortunately we are unable to take your allegations of race and gender discrimination for an investigation. Attached please find the Notice of Intake Closure Form. If you would like to appeal this decision please follow the instructions in the notice and you will be promptly assisted.

(Editor note: this web blog and document constitutes protected activity. This web blog is intended to help all persons to exercise or enjoy the right to non-discriminatory treatment in the “terms, conditions, or privileges” or “services or facilities” provided in connection with housing. This email is not intended to make any false, misleading, or derogatory statements nor is the email intended to defame or slander any person or entity or to express any opinions or facts not already a matter of public record or already disclosed to the public by communication to government agencies, entities, employees, officials or by publication by newspaper or other media distributed to the public. All rights reserved.)